Part I of this blog post explained that when a US person receives a gift from a foreign corporation or foreign partnership, bad things happen. Instead of the usual tax treatment for gifts – that is, they are not taxable income to the recipient, an exception applies with other rules. Nasty rules. Under these rules, the gift is given a nasty name – a "purported gift" and the tax treatment matches in nastiness. The US recipient of a "purported gift" must treat the "purported gift" as if it was in fact a distribution to him from the foreign corporation (e.g., a taxable dividend) or partnership (a taxable partnership distribution). Ouch!
There is hope, however. A transfer will not always be treated as a "purported gift" subject to re-characterization by the IRS. Initially, there are two possible escape hatches. Re-characterization can be avoided if the US recipient can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the IRS that either the recipient: (i) is not related to a partner or shareholder of the transferor-entity or (ii) does not have another relationship with a partner or shareholder of the transferor-entity that establishes a reasonable basis for concluding that the transferor would make a gratuitous transfer to the US individual. My guess is that the burden will not be easy to meet in most cases.
There are other exceptions to the purported gift rule specifically set out in the Treasury Regulations. If any one of them apply, the US recipient need not treat the purported gift as US taxable income. A recap is below -
The Treasury Regulations provide specific exceptions to the purported gift rule that, if applicable, do not require a US recipient to treat the purported gift as US taxable income. I shall discuss only one of the exceptions since it is the most relevant to individuals receiving significant sums from foreign corporations or partnerships. The other exceptions will typically not apply (e.g., when the US recipient is a US corporation or a charitable organization, or when the total gifts each year from such foreign entities are in de minimis amounts).
The "purported gift" rule does not apply when:
The US recipient can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the IRS that either a US citizen or resident alien individual who holds an interest in the foreign corporation or partnership treated and reported the purported gift for US federal income tax purposes as a distribution to such individual and a subsequent gift to the recipient. In other words, the IRS wants to make sure that the US shareholder or partner paid US tax on the distribution (purported gift) from the entity. If this did not happen, then the distributed amounts could escape US tax entirely, since the gift would not be taxed to the recipient.
In the case when only nonresident alien individuals hold interests in the foreign entity, then the US recipient must show that the foreign individual reported the purported gift for purposes of the tax laws of his country of residence as a distribution to him (i.e., he reported to his home country that a "deemed dividend" was made to him when the entity distributed the amounts to the US recipient) and, a subsequent gift made. In addition, the US recipient must have timely reported the gift on Form 3520, if required. You can read more about Form 3520 at my blog post here. With respect to this latter exception, many jurisdictions in the Middle East do not have income taxes and so, the exception will be impossible to meet. In those jurisdictions that may have an income tax, they often do not tax "deemed dividends" and therefore, the owner will not have reported such dividends since it is either not required or it is simply not possible. Furthermore, many jurisdictions do not require their residents to report gifts. The end result is that meeting this exception will not be possible for many US recipients receiving distributions from foreign corporations or partnerships that are owned by nonresident alien individuals.
And, Last But Not Least.... Don't Forget to Apply the Passive Foreign Investment Company (PFIC) Rules to that "Gift"
In addition to the already adverse US tax consequences that may result to a US recipient who gets a "purported gift", things can get worse if they are received from foreign corporations that are characterized as so-called "passive foreign investment companies". Many of the foreign family corporations I see in my practice hold only passive assets such as cash, securities, stocks, and other passive investments. These corporations will undoubtedly be characterized as PFICs, and a US recipient of a purported gift from such a corporation must apply the PFIC rules to the transfer with the result that a very large chunk of the gift (and maybe all of it) will be made to Uncle Sam. You can learn more about PFICs and the fury they create at my blog post here.
The information provided in this article is for general information purposes only. The information is not intended to be comprehensive or to include advice on which you may rely. You should always consult a suitably qualified professional on any specific matter.
Virginia La Torre Jeker J.D.
Virginia La Torre Jeker J.D., is based in Dubai. Virginia has been a member of the New York Bar since 1984 and is also admitted to practice before the United States Tax Court. She has over 30 years of experience specializing in the international aspects of US tax, including FATCA. She has been quoted in the New York Times and Newsweek, and is regularly quoted in many local news articles and publications."
Maastricht University - 5th Global Tax Policy Conference: Tax Policy after BEPS, what can be expected? On 6 September 2019 at the Royal Museums of Arts and History in Brussels, Prof. Dr Hans van den Hurk, chairman of the Annual Global Tax Policy Conference of the Maastricht Centre for Taxation (Maastricht University) with his esteem speakers are addressing the above question.Read more