India’s Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) issued a press release on May 10, notifying of a new Protocol amending the 33-year-old India Mauritius Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). The Indian government is now starting talks with Singapore to introduce similar amendments in its DTAA with the nation. The two developments address the longstanding issues of tax treaty abuse and round tripping of funds. They also bear testament to India’s commitment to the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) Action plan proposed by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
Key features of the Protocol to the India Mauritius DTAA (Protocol), as stated in the press release, are:
It is clear that India is keen to plug tax loopholes that have so far led to great loss of revenue for the state, a fact underlined by the OECD’s BEPS Project. In fact, India’s beneficial tax arrangement with Mauritius and Singapore is what led to the two countries becoming the top sources for foreign direct investment (FDI) into India. This in turn motivated the Indian government’s plans to revamp its respective tax treaties with them, further assisted by the BEPS’ goals.
At the same time, the new amendments to the India Mauritius DTAA is reflective of the government’s concern to ensure stability for investors. In this context, the biggest positive in the Protocol is that there will be no ‘retroactive’ impact as investments made prior to April 1, 2017 will be ‘grandfathered’. Further, the Protocol will also have ramifications for investments into India from Singapore. This is because the benefits of residence-based taxation of capital gains, on sale of shares under the India Singapore Protocol/DTAA, will be linked to the India Mauritius DTAA.
However, it is interesting to note that the Protocol does not incorporate ‘main purpose test’ and ‘bona fide business test’ explicitly, as mentioned in the government’s press release. It only says that the benefits of reduced capital gains taxation on sale of shares (available from April 2017 to March 2019) will not be available if the affairs were arranged with the primary purpose to take advantage of such benefits (or if it is a ‘shell/conduit company’). This appears to be a subjective test and no criteria have been laid down to be fulfilled.
The new Protocol to the India Mauritius DTAA is thus a significant tax development. It will have a major impact on numerous institutional funds, asset managers, and private companies that have used the Mauritius route to invest into India. Singapore, too, will become a less attractive destination for investment into India because the capital gains tax exemption under the Singapore treaty may also automatically end as negotiations are now ongoing for the same.
Finally, the impact of these developments will be felt maximally by Participatory Note (P-Note) investors, short-only funds such as hedge funds and high frequency traders, and particularly, investments from low cost borrowing nations since tax cost will now be majorly factored into the cost benefit analysis.
This article was first published on www.india-briefing.com.
Since its establishment in 1992, Dezan Shira & Associates has been guiding foreign clients through Asia's complex regulatory environment and assisting them with all aspects of legal, accounting, tax, internal control, HR, payroll and audit matters. As a full-service consultancy with operational offices across China, Hong Kong, India and emerging ASEAN, we are your reliable partner for business expansion in this region and beyond.Back to Articles
The information provided in this article is for general information purposes only. The information is not intended to be comprehensive or to include advice on which you may rely. You should always consult a suitably qualified professional on any specific matter.
Cyprus Self-Managed Alternative Investment Funds with Limited Number of Persons (AIFLNP) - Compliance Calendar Have you ever been in a situation where although you have the competency to perform a task you are unsure what the totality of the task might be? This situation can arise when numerous regulatory requirements are imposed on an organisation and further exacerbated by the almost exponential increase in the velocity of change of these requirements.Read more