Part I of this blog post discussed the general concept of what is called a "disregarded entity". It also examined how the "disregarded entity" is used (and misused) by non-US individuals who purchase US real property. Today's blog post will examine how the disregarded entity can be used by US persons to own foreign real estate.
Corporate entities set up for the purpose of owning foreign real estate run the risk of being classified as a "Controlled Foreign Corporation" (CFC) or a "Passive Foreign Investment Company" (PFIC). The tax rules governing these entities are generally known as "anti-deferral" tax regimes and were enacted to prevent US taxpayers from using foreign corporations to defer income taxes. Once a corporation is classified as either a CFC or a PFIC, very onerous tax consequences will follow, including very complex reporting obligations.
The US purchaser (who includes not only US citizens, but green card holders or individuals spending significant time in the US) must undertake proper US income tax planning before setting up the corporate vehicle. Failure to do so can result in harsh tax consequences including current taxation of certain rents even if amounts have not been distributed to the shareholder by the corporation, the loss of beneficial capital gains rates upon sale of the property, and with respect to a principal residence loss of mortgage interest deductions and loss of the exclusion for gain upon sale of the principal residence.
If the owner wishes to change the tax classification from a "corporation" to something else, he can use Form 8832, "Entity Classification Election". This is discussed in Part I of the post and the election permits an eligible entity to freely elect how it will be classified for federal income tax purposes. In the case of a foreign (non-US) corporation, it is often helpful to make an election to have the entity treated for tax purposes as disregarded as separate from its owner. In the case of a foreign corporation making an election to be treated as "disregarded", if it has only a single owner, it will be treated as a "foreign disregarded entity" or "FDE". In other words, the corporate entity is completely disregarded, but only for US tax purposes. So, for example, assuming local law tax benefits would arise if the property were owned by a local corporation, these would be preserved without the deleterious US tax consequences. In the proper circumstances, "checking the box" can truly result in the best of both worlds.
A foreign corporation is a CFC when more than 50 percent of its share value or voting power is controlled by so-called "US shareholders" (10% or greater owners). If a US shareholders control less than 50 percent of a foreign corporation's share value or voting power, it may instead be classified as a PFIC if one of the following applies:
Passive income generally includes capital gains, rent, interest, dividends and royalties.
When a corporation is classified as a CFC or a PFIC, certain gains generated by the company will be taxed to the US shareholder as ordinary income. Depending on whether the CFC or PFIC regime applies, amounts can be taxed to the US shareholder at a rate up to 39.6% percent (plus a possible 3.8% Medicare surcharge also known as the "Net Investment Income Tax," or NIIT), as opposed to the much more forgiving tax rates on long-term capital gains, which range from 0 to 20 percent depending on the filer's tax bracket. Often (but not in all cases), the harsh bite of the "anti-deferral rules" will apply, directly or indirectly, to gains on sale of any real property owned by the company, and to any rental income that is not determined to be earned in the "active conduct of a trade or business," a classification which can be very unpredictable.
In the case of a PFIC, additional taxes and compounded interest charges apply in the event of disposition of the PFIC company stock or receipt by the shareholder of a so-called "excess distribution" from the corporation. While some of these consequences can be avoided by electing to treat a PFIC as a "qualified electing fund" (QEF), this carries additional accounting and reporting requirements and is not always a feasible option.
There are significant record-keeping and reporting burdens imposed on US owners of CFC or PFIC shares. Form 5471 is one reporting form that involves significant disclosure depending on the "Category of Filer" status that the person meets.
For example, each US person that controls a foreign corporation and each 10% "U.S. shareholder" of a CFC is required to annually file this form to report its interest in the corporation and to report certain transactions with the entity. Each US person that acquires a 10% or larger interest in a foreign corporation (or disposes of sufficient interest to go below 10%) must file the Form 5471 to report the acquisition or disposition of the foreign corporation's stock.
With regard to PFIC, US shareholders of a PFIC must file Form 8621 when the investor receives an "excess distribution" from the PFIC or disposes of his PFIC shares resulting in an "excess distribution" or if he has made a so-called QEF election; even in the absence of such events, the Form is also required annually (there are certain exceptions). Form 8621 requires significant disclosure. You can read about the requirements at my blog post as well as in the instructions.
Given the harsh treatment often accorded to foreign "corporations" under the CFC or PFIC regime, "checking the box" can be considered to change the classification of the entity from a corporation to something more desirable. The FDE is often the vehicle of choice.
Next week's post will cover the topic of using a CTB Election to choose FDE status. Choosing FDE status can prevent disallowance of mortgage interest deductions and disallowance of the exclusion of gain on the sale of a personal residence owned in a foreign country when it is held through a foreign corporation.
I have often seen tax return preparers be very confused when faced with a client holding shares in a foreign limited liability company ending in the letters, "LLC". A non-US LLC is not the same as a US LLC. In the absence of a CTB election, a US LLC is "looked through" and the corporate entity is completely disregarded for US tax purposes. Accordingly a US LLC is characterized as a "sole proprietorship" if it has a single member, or a "partnership" if it has more than one member. Foreign LLCs are generally treated for US tax purposes as "separate" entities and characterized as "corporations". The local law must be examined to determine if the implementing legislation gives each member of the LLC "limited liability". If so, the entity will generally speaking, be treated as a "corporation" for US tax purposes.
The information provided in this article is for general information purposes only. The information is not intended to be comprehensive or to include advice on which you may rely. You should always consult a suitably qualified professional on any specific matter.
Virginia La Torre Jeker J.D.
Virginia La Torre Jeker J.D., is based in Dubai. Virginia has been a member of the New York Bar since 1984 and is also admitted to practice before the United States Tax Court. She has over 30 years of experience specializing in the international aspects of US tax, including FATCA. She has been quoted in the New York Times and Newsweek, and is regularly quoted in many local news articles and publications."
Maastricht University - 5th Global Tax Policy Conference: Tax Policy after BEPS, what can be expected? On 6 September 2019 at the Royal Museums of Arts and History in Brussels, Prof. Dr Hans van den Hurk, chairman of the Annual Global Tax Policy Conference of the Maastricht Centre for Taxation (Maastricht University) with his esteem speakers are addressing the above question.Read more