Hong Kong entered into a Double Taxation Arrangement (DTA) with China in 2006. The treaty acts as a way to avoid double taxation and clamp down on tax evasion, improving ties between both jurisdictions by reinforcing their respective tax laws, encouraging competition, and promoting investment. A fourth protocol was signed on April 1, 2015, amending four key aspects of the DTA. One of those aspects was a tax exemption for capital gains derived by foreign investors that sell shares of a China-based company, which was looked at in part one of this case study. Part two of the case study will approach issues that Company A should be aware of when applying for a capital gains tax exemption, and how to calculate the capital gain tax of restricted shares.
A global high profile venture capital holding company had a subsidiary incorporated in Hong Kong (Company A). Company B was a private Chinese company and decided to become a listed company. Before Company B became listed, Company A purchased restricted shares* of Company B. Company A planned to sell their shareholdings after a 12-month restricted stock trade period. Subsequently, Company A transferred RMB 20 million from Company B, which accounted for 32 percent of Company B’s total shares. Company B then launched a share reform scheme to increase registered capital to meet the China Securities Regulatory Commission’s requirements. The registered capital of Company B was RMB 70 million, and needed to increase to RMB 100 million. The remaining RMB 30 million was comprised of the following:
Due to the change of registered capital, the percentage of company A’s share decreased to 30 percent. Thus, the question stands – how are the differing components of the remaining RMB 30 million registered capital taxed?
*Restricted stock is not freely tradable, and for many investors, restricted stock holdings may constitute a large portion of their net assets.
First let’s look at definition of technical terminology:
For example, when a company issues and sells shares at a price greater than their face value. The contributed surplus figure helps both investors and the company to distinguish between non-operational and operational income.
Regulations issued by the State Administration of Taxation (SAT), namely Guo Shui Han (2009) notice No. 698, Article 3, clarifies the treatment of capital gains:
“Gains derived from transfer of equity shall refer to the balance amount after deducting the cost price of the equity from the transfer price of the equity. Cost price of equity shall mean the capital contribution amount actually paid to the Chinese resident enterprise at the time of investment and equity participation by the transferor of the equity, or the equity transfer amount actually paid to the original transferor of the said equity at the time of purchase of such equity.”
Thus, the cost of investment refers to the consideration originally paid by Company A to acquire Company B’s shares. Therefore, the RMB 20 million which was transferred from Company B will be treated as the cost of investment in capital gains tax computation.
Given the PRC Corporate Income Tax (CIT) Law and its implementation rule, as well as Notice No. 698, the equity shares which were converted from capital surplus cannot be regarded as the cost of investment in capital gains tax computation. However, when the registered capital was converted from legal earned surplus reserve and undistributed profit, it was split into two taxable events: 1) the profit declared as a dividend; and 2) the dividends re-injected into Company B. Therefore, the conversion of surplus reserve and undistributed profit can be regarded as the capital contribution, and thus can constitute the deductible cost of investment in capital gain tax computation.
Furthermore, during Company B’s Share Reform, Company B also converted undistributed profit into the capital reserves. Chinese tax authorities imposed a 10 percent withholding dividend tax during the conversion. Therefore, this capital reserve can be regarded as the capital contribution and a portion of the cost of investment.
According to Circular 53, which became effective on September 1, 2016, the section regarding accounting of disposals/selling of trading securities states that any transactions taking place before September 1, 2016 should be subject to a six percent VAT rate on the actual value-added portion. Furthermore, Clause 10 states that “Taxable events which occurred prior to this date but have not been dealt with shall be handled pursuant to this provision of this circular.” In light of this, Dezan Shira & Associates has attempted to negotiate with tax authorities that the legislation does not apply for Company A’s transaction, however, they claim that the legislation has a retrospective effect, hence Company A should pay withholding VAT for stock selling.
Circular 36 is the fundamental regulation on taxation expansion of the VAT reform. It clarifies the scope of taxpayers, scope of taxable activities, etc. The following is a summary of the points relevant to this case from the circular:
Therefore, from the above analysis, it can be deduced that capital gain tax over selling restricted shares should be subject to withholding tax and VAT on taxable activities in China.
In this second part of the case study, the question of how to calculate the capital gain tax was raised. It is crucial to define the cost of investment in order to calculate capital gain. However, the capital conversion during the share reform seen in this case study is a particularly unique situation, and current tax regulation does not expand on capital contribution. Therefore, it is advisable to consult relevant tax authorities to obtain proper guidance in respect of this. Furthermore, as Circular 53 states, any transactions made before September 1, 2016 are to be subject to a six percent VAT rate on the actual value-added portion. This recent development affects the situation explored in part one of this case study, which discussed the tax exposure and implication of capital gain, which is also subject to VAT on taxable activities in China.
This article was first published on www.china-briefing.com.
Since its establishment in 1992, Dezan Shira & Associates has been guiding foreign clients through Asia's complex regulatory environment and assisting them with all aspects of legal, accounting, tax, internal control, HR, payroll and audit matters. As a full-service consultancy with operational offices across China, Hong Kong, India and emerging ASEAN, we are your reliable partner for business expansion in this region and beyond.Back to Articles
The information provided in this article is for general information purposes only. The information is not intended to be comprehensive or to include advice on which you may rely. You should always consult a suitably qualified professional on any specific matter.
Cyprus Self-Managed Alternative Investment Funds with Limited Number of Persons (AIFLNP) - Compliance Calendar Have you ever been in a situation where although you have the competency to perform a task you are unsure what the totality of the task might be? This situation can arise when numerous regulatory requirements are imposed on an organisation and further exacerbated by the almost exponential increase in the velocity of change of these requirements.Read more