Hong Kong entered into a Double Taxation Arrangement (DTA) with China in 2006. The treaty acts as a way to avoid double taxation and clamp down on tax evasion, improving ties between both jurisdictions by reinforcing their respective tax laws, encouraging competition, and promoting investment. A fourth protocol was signed on April 1, 2015, amending four key aspects of the DTA. One of those aspects was tax exemption for capital gains derived by foreign investors that sell shares of a China based company, which we explore in detail below.
A global high profile venture capital holding company has a subsidiary incorporated in Hong Kong (Company A). Company A holds an aggregate of shares (above 25 million) of a China listed company (Company B). After a 12-month restricted stock trade period, Company A looks to sell shares of Company B, but wants to know how to meet the requirements for capital gains tax exemption under the tax treaty.
Overall, withholding tax applies to capital gains derived from transferring Company B’s shares. However, the DTA states that:
In practice, this means that the capital gain from such a transfer can be tax exempt if:
As mentioned above, a requirement for tax exemption is that the percentage of value of immovable property not exceed 50 percent. The State Administration of Taxation (SAT) defines ‘immovable property’ as including various kinds of buildings for business or non-business purposes, land use rights, and property accessory to immovable property. The assets and immovable property of a company will be recognized and valued under the prevailing accounting system in China in respect of asset treatment at that time (without taking liabilities into account). However, the value of the land or land use rights included in the relevant immovable property cannot be less than the market price of a comparable piece of land located in a similar district.
From Company B’s audit reports from the last three years, Dezan Shira & Associates calculated the value of immovable property and found that the percentages of total immovable property assets were lower than 50 percent, meaning that Company B was applicable for tax exemption.
The equity transfer may potentially enjoy tax exemption as well. However, as previously mentioned, if the capital participation equaled 25 percent or more in the 12 months prior to the transaction, capital gains will be subject to taxation in China. Moreover, it is critical to further check that shareholding was less than 25 percent in the 12 months prior to the transfer date, as the ratio of Company A’s shares might have changed from the start of Company B’s listing date to the current transfer date.
According to Company B’s 2015 financial year annual report and an official listed company online database, Company A held less than 25 percent of Company B’s total issued share capital. Therefore, the share transfer may also enjoy tax exemption.
Possession of a Tax Resident Certificate (TRC) is also a key requirement for tax exemption under the DTA. The Hong Kong Inland Revenue Department (IRD) will conduct a substance test when issuing the TRC. The test will consider factors such as nature of business, staff and remuneration, management and control, number of bank accounts and where income is derived. So far, Company A doesn’t qualify for the Hong Kong TRC. Therefore, Company A is not eligible for the tax exemption.
As a note, tax exemption eligibility also depends on whether the source of income derived from dividends, interest and royalties is from the beneficial owner, which is not expressly specified in the current DTA. The fourth protocol of the DTA introduces an article regarding anti-treaty abuse provision for capital gain on dividends, interests and royalties. It points out that, if an entity’s main purpose is to enjoy the DTA’s preferential tax policy, then it might be ineligible, and the Chinese side could use the domestic General Anti-Avoidance Rule (GAAR) to prevent treaty abuse. Chinese tax authorities assess GAAR cases by means of a purpose test and a substance test. In this case, if Company A was an operating entity, it would have fared well against GAAR challenges, since its purpose and substance are relatively easy to indicate.
However, as Company A is not eligible for tax exemption under the DTA, withholding tax is levied on Company A’s sale proceeds. Dezan Shira & Associates successfully handled the withholding tax procedure for Company A in its first round of share sales, and will continue to assist in subsequent share selling rounds.
This article was first published on www.china-briefing.com.
Since its establishment in 1992, Dezan Shira & Associates has been guiding foreign clients through Asia's complex regulatory environment and assisting them with all aspects of legal, accounting, tax, internal control, HR, payroll and audit matters. As a full-service consultancy with operational offices across China, Hong Kong, India and emerging ASEAN, we are your reliable partner for business expansion in this region and beyond.Back to Articles
The information provided in this article is for general information purposes only. The information is not intended to be comprehensive or to include advice on which you may rely. You should always consult a suitably qualified professional on any specific matter.
Maastricht University - 5th Global Tax Policy Conference: Tax Policy after BEPS, what can be expected? On 6 September 2019 at the Royal Museums of Arts and History in Brussels, Prof. Dr Hans van den Hurk, chairman of the Annual Global Tax Policy Conference of the Maastricht Centre for Taxation (Maastricht University) with his esteem speakers are addressing the above question.Read more